House Financial Services Committee Scrutinizes PWG Stablecoin Report
AT audience before the House Committee on Financial Services, the representatives considered the legislative recommendations of the President’s Working Group (“PWG”) of November 2021 Report on stablecoins. (To see also majority staff Memorandum.) Like before coveredchairman of the SEC Gary Gensler and director of the CFPB Rohit Chopra supported the recommendations and pledged that their agencies would take action to address the risks identified in the report.
Under Secretary for Home Finance Nellie Liang testified on risks which include: (i) the risk of stablecoin runs; (ii) payment system risks; and (iii) risks due to the concentration of economic power. Ms. Liang reiterated the recommendations of the PWG report, including: (i) limiting the issuance of stablecoins to insured depository institutions; (ii) empower supervisors of stablecoin issuers to set risk management standards; and (iii) putting in place measures to reduce concerns about the concentration of economic power. She pointed out that “[bank] The regulation provides a proven regulatory model that would protect against the prudential risks of stablecoins. »
Liang also said the Financial Stability Oversight Board is evaluating stablecoins for potential systemic risks, which could lead to certain stablecoin arrangements being designated as “systemically important payment activities.” She concluded that policy should not only focus on the digital assets themselves, but also on the regulation of intermediaries such as custodial wallet providers, and the systemic risks arising from investors’ leverage on digital assets.
UK and US financial authorities are working on CCP resolution issues
Senior officials from the Bank of England, FDIC, CFTC, SEC, and Federal Reserve Board saw again joint progress on (i) central counterparty (“CCP”) resolution issues and (ii) the development of detailed operational planning to support prototype resolution strategies for UK and US CCPs.
OFAC issues Ethiopia sanctions regulations
In addition, OFAC said it intends to issue more comprehensive regulations in the future, including “additional guidance and interpretative definitions, general licensing and other regulatory provisions.” The Ethiopia Sanctions Regulations will be effective upon publication in the Federal Register on February 9, 2022.
Separately, OFAC amended its regulations to implement the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 for the year 2022, which adjusts for inflation the maximum amount of civil monetary penalties. This amendment will be effective upon publication in the Federal Register on February 9, 2022.
DOJ charges two people with conspiracy to launder billions in stolen cryptocurrency
The GM accused two individuals plotting to launder money and conspiring to defraud the United States, linked to stolen cryptocurrency in a 2016 hack of Bitfinex, a virtual currency exchange.
The criminal complaint against the two individuals alleges that they used various “sophisticated money laundering techniques”, including: (i) the use of fictitious identities for online accounts; (ii) use computer programs to automate transactions; (iii) deposit the stolen crypto funds into “accounts at various virtual money changers and darknet markets and then withdraw the funds”; (iv) convert bitcoin into other cryptocurrencies using a practice called “chain hopping”; and (v) the use of “US-based business accounts to legitimize their banking activity”.
The DOJ said it seized more than $3.6 billion in cryptocurrency linked to the hack.
Individual Settles FINRA Fees for Churning and Excessive Trading Violations
An individual formerly associated with several brokers colonized fees related to brokerage account turnover and excessive trading.
According to an undisputed settlement offer (“settlement”), from 2014 to 2020, the individual shuffled and overtraded nine different accounts for seven clients in an effort to generate additional fee commissions. FINRA Enforcement said the individual made the same short-term trades across all accounts, sometimes using margin, which resulted in clients paying approximately $1.6 million in fees and other trading fees while suffering losses of $1.1 million. In doing so, the individual generated $1.5 million in commissions for himself and associated businesses. The FINRA application had alleged that the individual acted with intent to defraud his clients and failed to consider their best interests when engaging in trades.
According to the settlement, the individual was found guilty of violating SEA Rule 10b-5, FINRA Rule 2020 (“Use of manipulative, deceptive or other fraudulent devices”), FINRA Rule 2010 (“Standards of Trade Honor and Principles of Trade”) and FINRA Rule 2111 (“Suitability”) and, therefore, was prohibited from associating with any member of FINRA.
© Copyright 2022 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLPNational Law Review, Volume XII, Number 40